The Teach-Off – Dogme Day 4

Due to popular demand, here’s a picture of my boardwork to start with.

See if you can guess how the lesson unfolded!

This Monday started off like many other Mondays. Everyone had a lie-in on Sunday, everyone couldn’t get to sleep on Sunday night, and everyone feels fatigued on Monday morning.

I walked into a class of quiet and tired-looking students and started the day by asking them what they did over the weekend. One student revealed that he had gone to Bournemouth, while another said she went shopping in Westfield. Sensing that the students were indeed keen on talking about what they did over the weekend (and not just groaning because yet another teacher is asking them the same question), I handed it over to them and had them telling each other about their weekends in groups of three.

Ranging from walks in the park to dinner with mates, many of the students seemed to have had an interesting weekend. One student then said he stayed home over the weekend and read books in English…everyone was quite impressed. Scaffolding the language output, I fed in the phrasal verb ‘stay in’, as in ‘I stayed in all weekend’, and then realized I needed to clarify the grammar of the phrasal verb.

In the tradition of guided discovery/ consciousness-raising, I wrote the following up on the board.

I looked after my cat. 

He switched on the light.

 

TESCO drove the small businesses out.

 

I stayed in. 

We ate in.

 

My boyfriend and I broke up.

 

I then asked to students to note the similarities and differences between the two categories. In pairs, students decide that both categories contain phrasal verbs, and define phrasal verbs to each other. They then figure out that the first group of sentences took an object while the second group does not.

In order to introduce the grammatical labels for these phrasal verbs, I elicit from students words starting with ‘trans’.

Students come up with ‘transport’, ‘transmit’, ‘transgender’ (yes, a student did say this), ‘translate’, etc.

I then asked students what they thought ‘trans’ means.

They suggest ‘change’ and ‘movement’.

I then tell students that the group of phrasal above that take an object are called ‘transitive phrasal verbs’ because the action moves/transfers from the verb to an object.

I then elicit that the groups of phrasal verbs that do not take any object are ‘intransitive’.

To ensure, that they were clear, I asked the following concept questions:

Can I say, ‘We stayed in on Saturday night’? (yes)

If I say, ‘I ate in a restaurant’, is ‘ate in’ a phrasal verb?’ (no)

I had thought it would be harder for the students, but they unanimously said ‘no’ to the second question and seemed clear that ‘in a restaurant’ was an adverbial of place, and that ‘in’ did not belong to the verb ‘ate’, as in ‘ate in’.

I then drew attention to the group of transitive phrasal verbs, and asked for the difference between the first two and the last sentence of that group.

After discussing with their partner, they decided that the phrasal verb in the last sentence was separated and the object was what separated the two verbs.

I asked which of the first two phrasal verbs could also be separated, and students very quickly decide on the second, after realizing ‘I looked the cat after’ simply sounded wrong.

I asked, ‘What about the second group? The intransitive verbs? Which of them are separable?’

This was obviously a trick question, and as students began discussing with their groups, some of them started laughing, and in open class feedback exclaimed, ‘If there is no object, how can the object separate the phrasal verbs?

Bingo!

Seeing that chance to check up on the students’ dictionary skills has presented itself so neatly, I asked the students, ‘So, if you see a phrasal verb like ‘eat in’, how do you normally check for meaning and usage?’

I got students to show me what they could find and so students fished out their digital translators and/or activated their iPhone apps. Many admitted to using bilingual dictionaries, but many were not able to find a satisfactory example sentence or tips to its usage. Some were even not able to find the phrasal verb ‘eat in’ and were simply given the definition of ‘eat’.

We discussed the pros of using a monolingual dictionary at the level of their studies, and the crucial features a dictionary should contain, and I showed them the 4 possible ways a dictionary might attempt to indicate if a verb is transitive or intransitive.

(intr.)

switch the light on

switch sthg on

swtich   ~   on

Making a mental note to bring some dictionaries into class tomorrow to practice their dictionary and note-taking skills, I move the topic on to lexical notebooks and highlighted the usefulness of students having a separate lexical notebook at home which is categorized by topics or by alphabetical order.

Spending 10 minutes everyday transferring the lexis one learns in class into their lexical notebook at home is not only a great way to organise new lexis in an easily retrievable way, but is also a great tool for students to revise and consolidate the day’s learning, while raising questions about language items that students either had forgotten or are not sure about, so that they can ask the teacher in class the next day.

As I brought back the example sentence ‘Student C stayed in all weekend’, another student started asking, ‘Is that the same as “to have a lie-in”?’

We first clarified the difference in meaning between the two, but as we moved to form, we quickly realized that ‘a lie-in’ is a phrasal verb that has been made a noun (with the use of the hyphen) and that the phrasal verb ‘to lie in’ is not as often used.

We looked at the example ‘My boyfriend and I broke up’ and created the noun ‘a breakup’, as in ‘She was very upset about the horrible breakup’, before I reminded them of a phrasal verb they learnt last week that was made into a noun (I put my ‘leftovers’ in the fridge).

We then looked at other things that students did over the weekend, and Student A said that she was washing clothes. I elicited the expression ‘to do the laundry’, and then asked if any other students did any housework this weekend.  Several lexis regarding household chores started to appear, and after a short list was compiled, I decided to get students using the lexical items regarding the details of their weekend.

Putting the chairs in a circle, but deliberately leaving my own out, I stood in the middle of the circle and said, ‘If you did the laundry this weekend, please change seats’.

If you are reading this, you are most likely a TEFL teacher.

And if you are a TEFL teacher, you know how this goes. (groan, sign, mutter…)

But the students weren’t TEFL teachers, and found this activity utterly new and amusing, and we went on for about a good 10 to 15 minutes doing this amidst lots of giggles and laughter.

Hurrah for good ol’ TEFL games!

After our 15-minute break, we came back for a revision of the entire week. I gave the class about 10 minutes to review their notes and recall the week in pairs, and then distributed the mini-whiteboards, one per group.

I then proceeded to describe, explain or use the word in context, and students could negotiate with their partners before writing the lexical item on the board.

Through the revision process, several phrases and structures that students had doubts about were clarified, and I occasionally allowed students to fill the gaps with more than one answer, giving a point to each correct answer.

e.g. Chewing gum is _________________ in Singapore.

I accepted the answers ‘banned’, ‘prohibited’, ‘forbidden’ and ‘not allowed’.

I elicited that the sentence was in the passive voice and so the answer had to be a past participle.

However, seeing the negative in the option ‘not allowed’, I had a nagging feeling that students would not be too sure how that would work in the active voice.

So, I asked them to form the same sentence in the active, starting with the words, ‘The government _______________________ ,’ using the word ‘allow’.

Quite a few students wrote,

The government does not allow to have chewing gum in Singapore’,

and I realized that their difficulty was not the formation of the negative of the active verb ‘allow’, but the verb structure of ‘allow’ itself.

So I wrote,

The teacher didn’t allow me to smoke in class.

She doesn’t allow smoking.

She doesn’t allow students to eat in class.

I then had students discussing in pairs the structure of ‘allow’ in order to fill in the gap ‘The government doesn’t allow _________________’.

Students deduce that ‘allow’ is either followed by a noun, or by ‘sby + to-infinitive’, and so decide that the sentence should either read,

‘The government doesn’t allow smoking’

or

‘The government doesn’t allow us/the people to smoke’.

After our competitive bout of reviewing the week’s language items, we continued talking about the question students had last week about moving on the left of escalators in the London underground and driving on the left.

Some of the students had gone home to look up the reasons for driving on the left in the UK and had stories to tell. I put them in three groups of three (there were nine students in class today) and had those who had done some research telling the others. I then labelled the students of each group A, B and C, and had them sit with the others of with the same letter, thus changing their partnerships (yes, yes, you already know this because you are a TEFL teacher…), and then had the students recounting the stories that they had heard, all the time feeding in lexis and correcting students when necessary.

It was one of those days when you realize it’s 12 noon, but you really wish you had an extra half an hour with them…

Advertisements

The Teach-Off – Dogme Day 3

Three more students were transferred into the class today. One Japanese male, a Japanese female, and a Korean male. The Korean male was actually in my class last month, and this suddenly made the challenge a whole lot harder…I can no longer pull out tricks from my bag that I had pulled last month. This Dogme course is going further and further into the deep end!

The class started with the usual recall session, pairing the new students with students who were here the day before so that they can be brought up to date. As and when I heard students making generalized statements like, ‘We talked about places we would like to visit, then we talked about the laws in our country…’, I would jump in and prompt them for more details, saying, ‘Where did Student B want to go? What recommendations did she get? See if you can remember the details what your classmates said.

During the recall, one of the new students clearly showed some confusion over the word ‘emu’, and I realized that I owed the class a clarification. Using the computer and IWB in the classroom, I pulled up a picture of an ostrich, and one of an emu, and I had students comparing and contrasting the two, and using some descriptive language as they went along. Ostriches clearly had longer necks and emu had more feathers on theirs. As I filled in the word ‘feather’, we started talking about the ‘hair’ on dogs or cats and naturally, I fed in the word ‘fur’. The conversation moved to furs that one could use for clothes like mink coats, rugs made of kangaroo skin, etc, eliciting the lexis ‘controversial topic’ and ‘controversy’.

I then wrote on the board, ‘What would you do/not do?

And then wrote a selection of phrases that ranged from ‘buy a mink coat’, ‘use a neck piece made of rabbit fur’, ‘put a rug made of kangaroo skin in your living room’ to ‘use leather products’ and ‘eat beef’.

Students were put in groups of three to discuss the above.

While the ones who were clear animal rights supporters were much more vocal about what they would not do, those who did not see anything wrong with the use of animal fur for fashion purposes were slightly more hesitant to make their point (and this could be due to the nationalities and cultures of these students. They simply would not feel comfortable being provocative over such issues). It was at this point when I suddenly realized that this would not be a suitable topic for the members of this class, and decided to move on. Before I did, a Brazilian student very appropriately summarises his group discussion as follows, ‘If we are already using the meat for food, we should also use the rest of the animal.’

I took this opportunity to feed in the phrase ‘might as well’, as in ‘If we are already using the meat for food, we might as well use the rest of the animal’.

To exemplify its use, I gave students a few more example scenarios (that intentionally took the topic off dead animals):

‘I wanted to buy a Mulberry bag in Tokyo, but when I went to Japan, I saw that Mulberry bags were more expensive there than in the UK. Since I live in the UK, I thought I might as well buy it when I get back.’

 

‘I missed my train, and when I checked, I realized the next one is in 5 hours. I might as well walk home.’

 

‘For my history exam, I started studying chapters from my history textbook. Then my friend said that the teacher had mentioned that none of the questions will be related to the coursebook. I said, ‘I might as well not study’’.

With a few concept questions,

‘Is it my first choice?’ (no)

In the present situation, is it the best thing to do?’ (yes)

Then I established that ‘might as well’ is similar to saying ‘In this case, why not?’

As we returned to talking about the clothes we wore, the fire alarm went off for about one second, and we started looking at the phrasal verb ‘the alarm goes off’. We were talking about when our alarms go off in the morning, when a student struggled to say that he woke up at 5am every morning because he did it all the time and was ____________  _____  ______.

I fed in ‘to be used to + -ing /noun’ and was in the middle of concept checking when another student asked, ‘Is that the same as ‘get used to something’?

I got the students thinking about the difference between ‘to get married’ and ‘to be married’, and how ‘get’ signals a change, to action of ‘becoming’ while ‘to be’ was a state. In pairs they told each other of the difference.

I then redirected them back to ‘used to’ and got them to apply the differences between ‘get’ and ‘be’ by getting them to pick the correct verb in the example scenarios that I painted them.

e.g. ‘I didn’t like the food in London when I first got here. I _____ used to eating rice. I ________ used to eating potatoes everyday. After a few years, I ______ used to eating potatoes. Now I _____ used to eating potatoes.’

Then in groups of threes, they told each other about 3 things that they were/are not used to in London.

One mentioned the way everyone stood on the right to make way for those walking up the escalators on the left. In Japan, it is apparently the other way around and he kept getting confused in London. He then asked why we drove on the left but kept right on escalators. I must say I was dumbfounded by that question. How very astute.

Another student talked about how he was used to taking his shoes off when he entered someone’s house and couldn’t get used to the fact that he had to leave his shoes on in the shared flat he stayed in.

Another student then added that he could not get used to the self-checkouts in the supermarkets in London, and this led us into a whole new conversation about the evils of supermarkets. We spoke about the benefits of buying from smaller specialist shops, going to the baker’s for bread, the butcher’s for meat, etc. When a student asked if ‘the baker’s’ meant ‘the bakery’, we looked at how ‘Michael’s wine shop’ could be shortened to ‘Michael’s’, and therefore how ‘the butcher’s shop’ is simply ‘the butcher’s’, ‘the chemist’s’ is ‘the pharmacy’, and why when we say ‘I’m going to Chia’s’, we mean that we are going to ‘Chia’s house’.

The penny dropped at this point for some of the students when they realized why we say ‘MacDonald’s’, ‘Marks and Spencer’s’, and ‘Sainsbury’s’. At that point, a student asked why it was that we don’t say ‘Tesco’s’, and other students suggested that it was perhaps because Tesco wasn’t a person. Since nobody knew where Tesco got its name from, I decided on a quick skimming activity.

I googled ‘Where does Tesco get its name from?’ on the IWB, and was led to the Wikipedia page on Tesco, and said to students that I was going to scroll down the page and they should shout out when they see the information they are looking for.

When they found the relevant paragraph, they read it in detail and shared with their partner’s what they had learnt about the name ‘Tesco’ (The first three letters came from the initials of a shipment of tea, and ‘co’ came from the first two letters of the founder’s name ‘Cohen’).

I revealed to students at this point that I had decided to boycott Tesco several years ago, and this really piqued their interest. I explained that Tesco was undercutting their rivals, driving smaller shops out of business, and monopolizing the market, especially in smaller towns in the UK.

After a look at some of the lexis that emerged from that discussion, we had a 15-minute break, and I spent this time scouring the shelves of our Business English department, and came upon a DVD of a 2-minute news item regarding Tesco’s dominance in the UK. Now, I must admit, I had never seen this DVD before, but hey, isn’t the whole point about Dogme to improvise eclectically as and when something is needed?

I came back to the class after the break and I popped the DVD in, telling them that it was a news item about Tesco. Here I set them the following 2 tasks:

  1. What is the journalist’s take on Tesco? Is he positive or negative about Tesco? Is he for or against the supermarket chain?
  2. Take notes to summarise this news item for a friend who hasn’t seen it.

The first listening proved a little difficult for the students, so after a brief pair discussion, I elicited a basic premise and as I did so, I fed in certain key lexical items such as ‘to dominate’, ‘to have 58% market share’, ‘competition commission’ and ‘ombudsman’, all of which were crucial to the understanding of the news story. I then played the news item for the second time and had another pairwork stage, I again elicited more information about the news story.

We then went back to the beginning and did some intensive listening, whereby each sentence was played a few times until students were able to identify the individual words in the sentence. We did this with half the story, and then looked at some of the lexis in the story, followed by some progressive deletion (I deleted several words from the transcribed story on the board and students had to fill in the gaps…I then deleted more words, thus creating more gaps. See boardwork below).

Check out my atrocious drawings of the Ostrich and the Emu! And can you guess what the one at the bottom might be?

But how do we get a group of students from Far Eastern cultures to take part more actively in a conversation-driven lesson? I’m doing much more than mediating at the moment…

I still have yet to find the topic that motivates them, that fires them up…and I have this feeling that coming from cultures that pride structure and systematic learning, I still have to prove to them that this can be done with the coursebook…

Considering the fact that the brief on the way I teach was done on Day 1, and since then, the class has doubled, half the students have no idea why I am teaching in this maverick way… Do I explain again to the class what I am doing and why? Do I get those who were here on Day 1 to explain to those who weren’t? Do I just leave it, and do a massive revision session during the next lesson to solidify what they have learnt?

Nevertheless, Day 3 was so much better than Day 2…

The Teach-Off – Dogme Day 2

I have always found Day 2s quite hard.

You kind of know the students’ names but you haven’t got to know them yet. They have kind of been introduced to your rogue way of teaching but they aren’t quite convinced yet.
Day 2 is often the day my insecurities speak to me the loudest. I look at the students faces and wonder if they are thinking, ‘Why have we come all the way to London to be given this Asian-looking English teacher?’
Day 2 is often the day I start to do recall sessions, and the students are clueless as to what I’m trying to achieve.
Day 2 is often the day I feel most on edge…

But this Day Two was made even harder not only by the implicit knowledge of the teach-off happening, but also by the fact that there were a couple new students in the class, and I had to integrate them.

We started off with me asking students to recall yesterday’s lesson to their partners. As on every Day 2, despite my specific instructions not to only focus on the lexico-grammar notes they took, but to also look at the discussions and the contexts that arose, many of the students often draw a blank, staring at the page of their notebook, tempted to simply read off what they have written.

I went round the groups, encouraging them to remember the subjects we discussed, the topics involved, the questions asked and the things their classmates said…but to no avail…

Okay, it is Day 2.

So I brought students back to open class and prompted them further, finally eliciting the information that I blogged about yesterday. Special attention was paid to the mention of the perfect aspect and the present perfect continuous, and throughout the lesson, whenever the opportunity for self-correction arose, I grasped hold of it and had students practising the use of the perfect aspect in the contexts of whatever they were talking about.

Seeing that we had not really done a get-to-know-you session yesterday, I had all the students stand up and instructed them to arrange themselves in alphabetical order of their names. After some negotiating, students put themselves in their respective places, and took turns saying their names and the city they were born in.

We then repeated the same activity using ‘the city you were born in’ and then the ‘last film you watched’. The latter offered several opportunities for students to expand on the films that they had watched and to decide on whether they would recommend said film to their classmates or not, and why.

They then arranged themselves in chronological order of the time they went to bed the night before and then in alphabetical order of the country they would most like to visit. A quick round of sharing revealed that the countries that some of the students wanted to go to were countries others have been to, and so it made sense for them to sit with their new partners and exchange travel tips on where to go and what to eat.

Then in a carousel fashion, I moved the pairings so that everyone was now with a different partner. They then recounted the recommendations they were given by the previous partner. I find that any chance for students to practise recounting and reporting what others have said is a chance to emulate an activity that we often carry out in real life.

More get-to-know-you activities followed as I got students to sit in a circle and toss a ball around, stating the name and an interesting fact about the person they were tossing the ball to. Students of the class seemed to struggle remembering facts about their classmates, but in a very cool turn of events, a students mistakenly says the name of a classmate and then asks a question instead. I quickly changed the nature of the game and had everyone practising their question forms and answers instead. Once it became clear that everyone in the class knew each other’s name and felt slightly more comfortable with each other, I gave them a 15-minute break.

I came back from the break to find some students talking about where they lived in London and how they got to school. The conversation went on to be about the London transport system and then the fact that there was no free wifi in the London underground and most of the city.

At this point, the Iranian student started to say that Internet access was restricted and forbidden in her country, which led to some language work as student reformulated the sentence using the words ‘allow’, ‘prevent’ and ‘ban’. I drew the students’ attention to the fact that both ‘forbid’ and ‘allow’ share the same structure as the previously encountered ‘recommend’ eg allow sby to-infinitive, while ‘prevent’ and ‘ban’ take prepositions followed by noun/-ing.

We started talking about the strange things that were prohibited in our countries and I told students about the banning of chewing gum in Singapore, while the Brazilians spoke about the ban on outdoor advertising in Sao Paulo.

In a delayed correction stage, I decided to highlight the difference between /r/ and /l/ as it seemed to be a consistent problem amongst 4 (out of 6) of the students. We first looked at the position of the tongue in the mouth when producing the English /r/, and then the /l/. Following that, I said a few minimal pairs and students had to guess which sound they have heard, so as to encourage recognition of the different sounds. Students then had to produce the sounds themselves with the tongue twister ‘Red Lorry Yellow Lorry’.

The delayed correction then led on to work on Prepositions of Time, and I gave them a rule I had made up for the occasion.
‘on + one day’
‘in + more than one day’
‘at + special periods of time e.g. Christmas’

Try it! It works!

A bit more delayed correction brought us to the end of today’s lesson.

Day 2 is always hard…but we can try to make the most of it.

The Teach-Off – Dogme Day 1

I love the place I work for!

I went to work today and found out that the DOS team had not allocated the class I’m meant to teach because they wanted to ensure that I get the perfect number of students in the classroom (it would be difficult trying to do this teach-off with only 2 students).  So, we waited for the new intake to be processed, interviewed and put into levels, before I was told the best class to take. I cannot express enough about how grateful I am for the support this little challenge is getting from everyone!

For a recap of the premise of this challenge, click this!

These are the things that I found out today:

  1. The level is Mid-Intermediate A. The class:  daily Mondays to Fridays, 9am to 12noon. I will be going Dogme with this group for 2 weeks.
  2. The coursebook I am up against is one of the best coursebooks in the market – Lindsay Clanfield’s Global (Macmillan)…yes, it’s time to panic!
  3. There are 5 students in the class at the moment but the DOS team is adding a few more in tomorrow so that I get an optimum size (which I believe is about 8 -10).
  4. Here is some brief information about the students:

Student A

Japanese female, IT Systems Engineer, in London because her husband has been transferred here. Needs English for day-to-day survival.

Student B

Iranian female, potential undergraduate in Management and Marketing. Wants to study at an English university.

Student C

Japanese male, film graduate, in London because he loves the art scene in Europe and dreams of travelling around the world after 6 months of English studies.

Student D

Korean male, ex-salesperson who has quit his job to come to London and wants to do a Masters in Business Management.

Student E

Brazilian male, marketing manager who needs English for his work.

The lesson started off with some self-introductions, as I probed the students for the above information. The following questions are things I always ask my students on the first day…

Where are you from?’

‘What do you do?’

‘How long have you been here?’

‘Why did you decide to come to London to study English?’

‘Why do you need English?

As they answer them, I ask more questions to expand on their answers…partly for my needs analysis, and partly because I am just curious…

After talking to different students and dealing with lots of emergent lexis about what they do in London, Student A said she had been here for a month, but it was her first day at IH London. Naturally, I followed up by asking, ‘What have you been doing for the last month?’ but her answer clearly showed her lack of understanding of the question. So I quickly clarified and asked her if I was asking about the past month or the coming month. We, as a class, established that I was talking about the past month, and Student A answered, ‘Shopping, staying at home and talking on Skype to my family and friends in Japan.’

Sneakily, at this point, I asked the class, ‘What was the question I asked her? Do you remember? Tell your partner.’

Although I had just asked the question a couple of time just moments ago, the students struggled to formulate the question, which clearly showed that they hadn’t got to the stage of noticing the grammatical form of the present perfect continuous yet. I drew the timeline for the present perfect continuous on the board and Student B said, ‘What did you do last month?’ while Student D said, ‘It’s continuing until now, so it should be ‘What were you doing last month?

This was the information I needed to know where they were at with their knowledge and usage of grammar and allowed me to plan the scaffolding on the spot as appropriately as possible.

So, I wrote ‘What did you do last month?’ and asked the concept questions:

Is this talking about the past, present, or future?’  (past)

‘What is the first verb in the sentence?’ (did)

So where in my mind am I? Am I imagining myself in the past, present or future?’ (past)

Is this connected to the present?’ (no)

This was further clarified with a timeline.

I then set up a scenario: Student A sees me in class and asks me out to lunch. I say ‘I have eaten’.

What is the first verb in the sentence?’ (have)

So where in my mind am I? Am I imagining myself in the past, present or future?’ (present)

Is the second verb in the past, present or future?’ (past)

We establish that ‘I have eaten – so NOW I am not hungry’ suggests that the second past verb is connected to the present, and we label this ‘Past in the Present

I have eaten
Subject First verb in the present Past (from point of view of the first verb)

This was further clarified with a timeline and lots of jumping around the classroom.

I then set up the scenario: Student A decides then to ask me for dinner tomorrow. She says, ‘Let’s meet at 3pm!’ But at 3pm, I _______ ______ ____________.

Students agree that the first verb ought to be in the future and choose ‘will’. They then agree that the verb ‘work’ should be signaling the present (at 3pm tomorrow) and there should be ‘working’. With a bit of prompting, we decide that ‘I will working’ is not correct as the modal ‘will’ must be followed by an –ing form. A student cleverly suggests ‘will be working’.

We then labelled the above ‘Present in the Future’

I will be working
Subject First verb signalling the future Present (from point of view of the first verb)

I extended the scenario: I then say to Student A, ‘How about we meet at 5pm? I don’t know exactly what time I will finish but I know that I will finish before 5pm. I might finish at 4pm or 4.30pm. I don’t know. But I know that by 5pm, I _____ ______ _______________.

Students agree that the first verb is still in the future and quickly say ‘will’. They then discuss and agree that ‘finished’ should be in there somewhere because it is something that is the ‘past’ from the viewpoint of 5pm the next day. However, ‘will finished’ did not seem right. Eventually, a student suggests ‘will have finished’.

 

We labelled the above ‘Past in the Future’.

I will have finished
Subject First verb signalling the future Past (from the point of view of the first verb)

We go on like this, giving new labels to the tenses they already know, revising them while clarifying the underlying meanings of the different aspects and highlighting the importance of the first verb in indicating where the speaker’s mind/imagination is at.

Now, the students are ready for the present perfect continuous…

I take them back to the original context: Student A came to London on the 2nd of March. I want to know about her actions until now. The hint ‘until now’ suggests that my mind is in the present, past or future?

My students suggest that I should be standing in the ‘present’ part of the classroom but looking back at the ‘past’…but the ‘past’ would continue till the ‘present’.

We thus work out that ‘I have been shopping’ is the ‘Continuous from the past into the present’.

 

I have been shopping
Subject First verb in the present Past (from the point of view of the first verb) Continues to the first verb

  

At this point, Student A said she has been going shopping in the supermarkets. We started to look at the difference between ‘to go shopping’ and ‘to do the shopping’, highlighting that ‘doing the shopping’ involves groceries and is not often the most enjoyable activity for many of us. I mentioned that I prefer to do my shopping online as it reduces the hassle of carrying all the heavy bags home, seeing that I don’t drive.

This led the conversation to online shopping, and a student mentioned how she didn’t like to shop for clothes online because she couldn’t try them on. I then said that I liked shopping for my tops online in shops that I am familiar with, but hesitated to do so with trousers because they might need alterations. If the trousers were too long, I would need to have them __________.

We looked at making verbs from adjectives e.g. short – shorten, fat – fatten, wide – widen; verbs from nouns e.g. length – lengthen, strength – strengthen; and adjectives describing functions using those verbs e.g. whitening toothpaste, fattening foods, bone-strengthening milk (always with contexts and example scenarios, of course). We then talked about the difference between fattening foods and fatty meats, and the conversation led to the types of healthy or unhealthy foods they ate.

I didn’t explain to them the nature of this teach-off/experiment, for fear of skewing their opinions and feedback…but as it was important to do what I always do in my normal classes, I spent the remaining 6 minutes explaining to the students my method of teaching (Dogme) and how I don’t use coursebooks, and they agreed to it (I didn’t force them, I swear!). I also highlighted that we would be covering lots of grammar and lexis (I pointed to the board at the point) despite not using the coursebook, and that it was essential they brought a notebook with them everyday so as to make notes of what they cover in class as they would be tested on them the next day.

I walked out of the class smiling and feeling really optimistic about the teach-off.

I love the place I work for!

The Teach-Off – the premise

Today is the day – the day of the teach-off.

What teach-off, you ask?

Following the much-talked and much-blogged about Dogme debate that ensued after the IH DOS conference in January, my DOS publicly challenged me to a Dogme versus Coursebook teach-off in a comment to a series of my Dogme blogposts.

My initial reaction was to wave it off as unscientific, seeing that different teachers would apply Dogme principles very differently to different lessons and different students, and the same could be said for coursebook-based teachers.

However, after some consideration (and egging-on from the people around me), I decided that rather than being purely a competition, we could milk this as an opportunity to develop and to challenge ourselves, to reflect and to be open to feedback and constructive criticism both from our students and from each other. It was with CPD in mind that I accepted the challenge.

So, these are the rules:

1. Over the period of a 4-week long course, I would take the 1st 2 weeks and my DOS will take the subsequent 2 weeks.

2. I am not allowed to use any course books or materials except when students bring in their own materials, or when materials are introduced in an impromptu, improvised manner, led from emergent topics and conversations in the classroom.

3. My DOS is allowed to adapt the course book materials but has to use at least 50% of what is in the course book at least 50% of the time.

4. In Week 2 of both our teaching slots, we have to spend two days doing the opposite of what we are used to, i.e. I have to teach from a course book for 2 days while she has to go Dogme for 2 days.

5. We will observe each others’ lessons (except in my Week 1, when my DOS is off on holiday).

6. We will not tell the students about the teach-off, except to say that they will be getting two teachers for the price of one. We are, however, allowed to explain to our students our methodology of teaching (if that’s what we normally do).

7. We will keep daily reflective journals that relates in detail the goings-on the classroom for that day.

8. We will have regular meetings to discuss the lessons and give each other feedback.

9. We will be teaching Pre-Intermediate (They asked me to pick a level and considering the constant criticism that Dogme cannot be used with low level classes, I went for the lowest level available)

10. My DOS will be my peer for the purpose of this experiment.

I’ll be meeting this group of new students tomorrow morning and I am nervous…very nervous…

Suddenly, I feel like I’m losing all my courage and feeling so very small…

Why have I agreed to this?